Technical examination of failures involves identifying the reason behind a breakdown in a structure. Failures are seldom random. They are typically caused by design mistakes or inadequate maintenance. By using specialist testing methods, investigators can work out what failed and why, and then offer solutions to stop it happening again.
Why Technical Investigations Are Carried Out
An investigation helps reveal how a structure or part responded under specific conditions. These investigations support many different fields such as construction, energy, and transport. They rely on a combination of physical evidence, technical evaluation, and engineering knowledge to come to a conclusion based on measurable facts.
How Engineering Failure Analysis Works
- Start by gathering documents, user data, and site information
- Inspect parts to identify corrosion, fractures, or irregularities
- Carry out deeper analysis using SEM or material profiling
- Perform tests to confirm or rule out chemical or mechanical defects
- Interpret findings using design and stress calculations
- Summarise all findings and produce a report with suggested actions
Common Applications in the Field
Failure analysis supports industries such as aerospace, automotive, and civil engineering. For example, if a bolt shears or a weld fails, engineers may carry out chemical testing or stress analysis to determine the cause. These findings are used to adjust future designs and can reduce both cost and operational disruption.
Why It Matters to Organisations
Organisations use failure investigations to reduce unplanned maintenance, detect weak points early, and support insurance or legal documentation. Feedback from these reviews also guides engineering decisions. Over time, this leads to more predictable performance and improved asset life.
Frequently Asked Questions
What triggers a failure investigation?
Triggered by incidents involving breakdowns, malfunctions, or safety concerns.
Who carries out the analysis work?
Often led by engineers skilled in forensic assessment, testing, and reporting.
Which methods support failure identification?
Instruments might include electron microscopes, hardness testers, strain gauges, or digital models.
Is there a typical timeframe?
Time depends on how much testing is needed and whether site visits are required.
What are the results used for?
Includes a breakdown of the issue, test data, and advice for future prevention.
Main Takeaway
By reviewing what failed and why, engineers reduce future risk and improve reliability.
Find out more engineering investigation by website visiting GBB's website